The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010

The maps below depict the layout of road access to a hospital, in two different years. Some noticeable changes are applied in 2010 compared to 2007.

Although the main venue stayed unchanged, some improvements are made to the outside of City hospital, mainly in terms of car parks and bus stops.

In 2007, two rows of bus stops existed on two sides of the entrance Hospital road, while there were three of them on each side, which were totally substituted with a single area as a bus station on the left side of the mentioned road. Two roundabouts are also constructed to the previous junctions, at the two ends of that road, one at the building’s gate and the other at the intersection of the road and the City road. Whereas, buses can enter and leave the station through joints at these two squares.

Another major renovation in the plan is the division of the car park into two separate grounds. Whilst public used to park their cars at the same parking place, a new space is now allocated for their vehicles on the right-wing of the hospital with a particular entrance, and the former car park that is located on the right side of the Hospital road, on the opposite side to the bus station, now belongs to the staff only. Despite these refurbishments, the main venue and the Ring road around it have remained unchanged during this period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50331724362 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7046774731 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314205043529 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121729967424 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948602630034 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18656209738 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132226511199 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.