The two maps illustrate the way to get to a city hospital in two different years, 2007 and 2010.
Overall, we can see that the newer map involves making some changes to the staff and public's carpark, and there is no change for Ring road which was surrounded the hospital.
The most noticeable change from road access in 2007 to 2010 was that organization of buses parked aside of hospital road in 2010. This organization was achieved by creating a new bus station on the west side of hospital road, which is linked to three main roads with tow roundabouts that were constructed at the northern and southern junction.
Another transformation in 2010 which we can see is that staff carpark was separated from the public carpark. New public carpark was made on the east side of the hospital which accesses to the hospital by Ring road, whereas staff could park their cars at the same carpark.
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city, by gender.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the graph below shows the number of students enrolled in universities by gender within three years in country A 58
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72611464968 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50316040247 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2136654496 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226298270237 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132503650179 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873583814856 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156552055458 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844725589593 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.