The diagrams compare the road plan for a hospital in a city between the year 2007 and 2010.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the new road access is more abundant than the old plan.
In 2007, there were bus stops with three respectively along the hospital road on both sides. After the renovation, We may see that the main entrance of the city hospital was changed to a roundabout, and the exit of the hospital road was also rebuilt to connect with city road. Moreover, the original plan of bus stops was moved to the left-hand side with a rectangular station, which was connected with two roundabouts.
On the right-hand side of the hospital road, there was a car park, where entrance in ring road, for staff and public use before reconstruction. In 2010, there were two car parks independently. The new car park for staff still stayed in the original place, while the location of the public car park would be arranged on the right-hand side next to the city hospital. Both car parks was entranced in ring road also.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- THE CHART BELOWSHOWS THE PERCENTGE OF HOUSEHOLDS IN OWNED AND RENTED ACCOMODATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES BETWEEN 1918 AND 2011. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- the graph show relative price changes for fresh fruit and vegetable, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drink between 1979 and 2009. 11
- The bar chart shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...th car parks was entranced in ring road also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61202185792 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52733274256 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2152936094 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191165787538 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956280825975 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060546808026 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128319414351 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537421497128 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.