The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of women, men and children consuming five servings of fruit and vegetables each day in 8 years from 2001 to 2008 in the UK.
Overall, the types of investigators were divided to men, women and children. Likewise, women were the highest group to have the healthy eating habit, the second were men and children were not interested on it.
it can be clearly seen that women got a well starting at 22% and it rose consistently to the highest at 40% in 2006. Moreover, there were just 12% and 17% of children and men who were held a habit of eating healthy from 2001 to 2003, separately. Since 2003, the significant increases were observed on both lowest species, the proportion of men and children raised to 27% and 22% individually in 2006.
after that, the trend of women dropped slightly to 35% and 30% after the two years. men also discovered a soft decrease in 2008, at 27% finally. However, while the data of children were declined to 25% eventually, it reached its highest at 26% in 2007.
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Every year several languages die out, some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large no. of young adults compared with the no. of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 years from 2001 to 2008 in the UK. Overall, the types of investigators were...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children were not interested on it. it can be clearly seen that women got a ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...dren were not interested on it. it can be clearly seen that women got a we...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to 27% and 22% individually in 2006. after that, the trend of women dropped s...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...% and 22% individually in 2006. after that, the trend of women dropped slight...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Men
...tly to 35% and 30% after the two years. men also discovered a soft decrease in 2008...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72282608696 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59014577799 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3166624979 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109838748872 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524275043188 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104960709403 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101157713836 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137200616243 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.