The two pie charts below compare the percentagewise contribution in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016
The two pie charts below compare the percentage wise contribution in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016.
At 24% we can see that agriculture accounted for majority of the contribution to GDP of Turkey in 2000, but this percentage had dropped to 14% by 2016. During the same sixteen year period construction sector rapidly grow and it's share in economy went from just 3% to 10%. However, similar tradition followed by manufacturing sector. By 2016, in economy 12% contribution given by manufacturing sector. Throughout the years 2000 to 2016 trade, utilities and transport contribution increased 2 %, which was 16% in 2016.
Interestingly, both health/education sector and leisure/hospitality sectors contribute same percentage to economy in 2000. While contribution of health/education sector remained 17% in 2016, leisure/hospitality contribution fall by 3%. Through out the years 2000-2016 contribution of government in GDP went from 12% to 9%. Whereas opposite trend in the case of finanace, business and other sectors. In 2000 finance, business and other sectors contribution is 5%, by 2016 contribution increased to 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | Sarwan1996 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in Turkish economy by various sectors in 2000 and 2016. At 24% we can see...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'sector' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sectors'.
Suggestion: sectors
...e same sixteen year period construction sector rapidly grow and its share in economy w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 to 2016 trade, utilities and transport contribution increased 2 %, which was 16...
^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: Throughout
...re/hospitality contribution fall by 3%. Through out the years 2000-2016 contribution of gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...rs. In 2000 finance, business and other sectors contribution is 5%, by 2016 contributio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57714285714 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5833493497 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5495015595 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7272727273 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467686810234 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200315953836 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191808611619 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424820199035 0.15604864568 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231924777313 0.0819641961636 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.