The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts below compare the proportions of online shopping sales across 4 distinct retail sectors in Canada during the period of 5 years starting from 2005.
In general, what emerges from the two charts is that there was a significant change in the proportion of online buying. There was a remarkable increase in both food & beverage and video games, while electronics & appliances and home furnishings steadily fall during the period.
Looking at the detail, it can be seen that the majority of online sales was witnessed for the electronics and appliance sector, standing at over one-third of the total sales in 2005. However, this percentage slightly dropped to 30% by 2010. During the same five-year period, the number of people buying food and beverage noticeably increased, standing at 32%, and became the largest proportion of the online market.
When examining the specifics, it is evident that the most dramatic decline was in the home furnishings retail sector, with a fall of 10% from 2005 to 2010 in Canada. Besides, online sales of video games accidentally overtook sales of home furnishings, although video games still represented only 23% of the market in 2010.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-05 jasmine.27 84 view
2022-06-09 vananhxh2005 view
2018-07-14 Duong Vu Tuan Minh 44 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two pie charts below compare the pro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period of 5 years starting from 2005. In general, what emerges from the two ch...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings steadily fall during the period. Looking at the detail, it can be seen th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgest proportion of the online market. When examining the specifics, it is evid...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, still, third, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13917525773 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68855283127 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1884717552 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247274730115 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107905316866 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989374671983 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167820584994 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104464785554 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two pie charts below compare the pro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period of 5 years starting from 2005. In general, what emerges from the two ch...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings steadily fall during the period. Looking at the detail, it can be seen th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgest proportion of the online market. When examining the specifics, it is evid...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, still, third, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13917525773 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68855283127 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1884717552 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247274730115 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107905316866 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989374671983 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167820584994 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104464785554 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.