The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The two pie charts compare the percentage of online sales for retail areas in Canada in five years from 2005 to 2010. From the general perspective, different trends could be observed, including a growth of food and beverage and video games, a reduction of electronics and appliance and home furnishings.
In 2005, it is evident from the information provided that electronics and appliance and home furnishings made up the biggest proportion of online sales, in which the highest percentage of electronics and appliance at over a third, followed by home furnishings, food and beverage, and video games. After five years, there was a change in ranking among the categories, in which food and beverage were at the top of online sales at nearly a third, in contrast, home furnishings were at the bottom at 15%.
From 2005 to 2010, food and beverage witnessed a significant rise of 10% in the online sales rate, similarly, video games grew slightly from 18% in 2005 to nearly a quarter in 2010. Nevertheless, as food's and beverage's and video games' percentage rose, the proportion of online sales in electronics and appliance, and home furnishings experienced a steady decline of 5% and 10% respectively.
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 73
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day in 2015 67
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, similarly, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05527638191 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9560896807 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8480526289 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.666666667 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212732329828 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140352108184 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172202986319 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171391320159 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978098591264 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.