The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The pie charts give information about the proportion of online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
It is clear from the pie charts that the percentages of Electronic & Appliance and Home furnishings had a downward trend, the reverse is true with the statistic of Food & Beverage and Video games. People who choose Electronic & Appliance to shop online took up the quite large part both 2005 and 2010.
In 2005, the proportion of Electronic & Appliance was highest in all the option with about 35 percent. There were 22 percent and 25 percent of people choosing home furnishing and foods when they purchased something in websites. Only 18 percent of online sales for retail sector came from video games and smaller than the rest in Canada.
The statistic was quite a lot changes in 2010 when Food and Beverage went beyond the electronic devices with 2 percent as much as and attained the first position in the percentage. By contrast, People gradually tend to buy live furniture so at the same time, home furnishing witnessed a steep decrease to 15 percent and much less than three other options. There was a light increase of 5 percent in the percentage of video games in 2005, reaching 23 percent.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-01 | Ranjana thapa chhetri | 56 | view |
2019-09-03 | Mike1510 | 56 | view |
Comments
The given pie chat describes
The given pie chat describes the online salse of retail sectors in canada by the year 2005 and 2010. It also shows the percentage of sales with respect to the departments in those years.
In 2005 sales of video games is at bottom when compared to all other. on the other hand electronics & appliances remains at the top.
when it comes to 2010 those peak and low places were replaced by the good & beverages and home furnishings.
when we compare the department wise video games sales hiked from 18 % to 23%, food & beverages upsurge by 10 % in 2010 when compared to 2005. However electronics & appliances, home furnishings sales have a down fall of 5 and 10 %.
In conclusion, retails sales of food & beverages, video games raised over the years. when it comes to home furnishings and electronics & appliances we see the shrink.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to home'
Suggestion: to home
...rcent and 25 percent of people choosing home furnishing and foods when they purchase...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55921657618 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5541666395 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261614622624 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133902992122 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187208518782 0.0843802449381 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238211671619 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222858403962 0.0819641961636 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.