high technology
Some people assume that the development of technology has made mankind's life better whilst others argue that there are the enormous negative effects and create many troubles for people. Both points of view have their merits and I partly agree with them.
On the one hand, with high technology, the companies have improved the quality and quantity of their merchandise in order to increase the sales. The substitution of manpower by the manufacture as a way to do this. Besides, it is easier for people to communicate with others from all over the world when the presence of technology. There is a great deal of ways to keep in touch with friends, even though they are not face to face. For example, Internet or Messenger can give them a hand. With the development of society, the demand of human also increases gradually and technology can satisfy these demands. A typical example of it is if people have enough clothes, perhaps they will want to possess the fashionable clothes or decorated with jewelry.
By contrast, the environmental pollution increase extremely as a result of the uncontrolled development of hi-tech era. The numbers of forest were devastated by the exploring too much of humanity. In additionally, dissipating the traditional culture was happening because the cultural integration without the careful selection so the social evil becomes more and more difficult to impede. The chief affair is a burst of technology-related diseases, such as spinal disease, ophthalmic disease and mental affairs. This has been proved that people who addicted game often exist few troubles with their eye, typically with myopia.
In conclusion, in the many aspects, technology can help our lives better, but it also has the negative influences if people do not manage it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me people assume that the development of technology has made mankinds life better...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...numbers of forest were devastated by the exploring too much of humanity. In addit...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful selection so the social evil becomes more and more difficult to impede. The c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12371134021 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85942454615 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635738831615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0740607337 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134730964091 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359819185374 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051130024266 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797999427253 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211044773433 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.