The two pie charts below show some employment pattern in Great Britain In 1992
The pie charts given below illustrate some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. The data are measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the biggest percentage in male is Managerial and Professional, while the smallest is general labourers. The biggest percentage in female is clerical or related, and the smallest category is general labourers.
Looking at the first pie charts was female, the largest percentage was clerical or related which had 31%. Different from Managerial and Professional as the second biggest percentage was 29%. Followed by other manual, it got 27%. While other non-manual, craft or similar, and general labourers had the total 13%, which were the smallest percentages of all employment patterns.
However, male showed some patterns which was dominated by Managerial and Professional, it got 36%. The second biggest percentage was 26% from Other Manual. Followed by Craft or Similar, it got 24%. The smallest percentages of all employment patterns were Clerical or Related, Other Non-manual and General Labourers which had total almost less than a fifth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | Sandeep USA | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Sakib | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 60
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 67
- The charts below show the electricity generated in Germany and France for all sources and renewables in years 2009 67
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42441860465 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86968522554 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1340635316 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196403094439 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864498803032 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189181343902 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149967021766 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916567289106 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.