The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The given circular charts reveal the information about the 5 significant sources of energy by USA in 80's and 90's. It is caliberated in per centum.
It is clearly seen that oil was the main source of energy in the 1980. Which is 42% of the total. In addition to this, over a quarter had been covered by the natural gas in 1980s. Furthermore, coal, hydroelectric power as well as nuclear power were the sources of energy. Which were about 22%, 5% and 5% respectively.
Secondly, in 1990s the main contribution in the energy was shown by natural gas which was 33% of the total. Apart from this, natural gas had covered exactly the quarter in 1990. There was no change in the popularity of the hydroelectric power as their contribution remained the same in both 80's and 90's. Moreover, both coal and nuclear plant had given as the medium of energy which were 27% and 10% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that oil leads and hydroelectric power lacks as the sources of energy in both 80's and 90's.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010. 73
- Some people believe that television is a powerful educational tool Other people believe that television is nothing more than mindless entertainment and should be discouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Discuss both view and 92
- The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with good parenting skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like the very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the main source of energy in the 1980. Which is 42% of the total. In addition to thi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ter had been covered by the natural gas in 1980s. Furthermore, coal, hydroelectric power...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tric power as well as nuclear power were the sources of energy. Which were about ...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...%, 5% and 5% respectively. Secondly, in 1990s the main contribution in the energy was...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60893854749 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68081926337 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474860335196 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2622715671 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.75 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136439393697 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479714918669 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588429372015 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886161459914 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335738313601 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.