It is said that the amount of violence in the TV programs has negative effects on social development and therefore should be reduced. To what extent you agree and disagree.
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking bare footed in the jolungle to take first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issue which remain irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should violent TV program be benned ?. I 70% agree and 30% disagree with the statement because of its adverse effects on society. I shall explore the dimension oftopic in the upcoming paragraphs.
Beyond doubt, whenever we talk about the entertainment, TV programs are in the top of priority of each individuals. Yet, violence in the TV program has adverse effects especially on youngsters this result in incline in number of unlawful activities across the globe. For instance, murder of one student name " Perduman " by his classmate at Ryan International Public School situated in New Delhi is also the result of violence program in TV as these programs sow the seed of bitterness in the mind of child.
Additionally, teenagers get easily attracted by the things that are being telecast on the TV by respective channels. They find it cool when their favourite celebrities drink and smoke in the program. Teen imitate their life style, in the long run these teenagers become addicted of both alcohol as well as smoking. For example a recent survey conducted by Times Of India in New Delhi asserts that around 70% of youngsters start this unhealthy activity just to imitate the life style of their loving star.
However, I would not overlook the other side too. To begin with, some people love to watch violent program as they are full of action as well as funny dialogue. If these programs are restricted by government these group of people do not able to enjoy their free time.
To conclude, there is no doubt TV programs are the best source of entertainment but as we know that " all glitter is not gold ". There are some violent program which cause violence in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Nikhil Sharma | 84 | view |
- The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010. 73
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like the very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 68
- The pie chart below show the main reason why agriculture land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of world during the 1990. 78
- Light corporal punishment is being introduced in school of UK. What are the advantages and disadvantages. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal Public School situated in New Delhi is also the result of violence program i...
^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...enagers become addicted of both alcohol as well as smoking. For example a recent survey co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll of action as well as funny dialogue. If these programs are restricted by govern...
^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'programs'?
Suggestion: programs
...not gold '. There are some violent program which cause violence in society.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69923916087 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8076457029 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16688093698 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490471658846 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502857165943 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892090757305 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423325578433 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.