The two pie charts show the percentage of the pollutants entering a particular part of ocean in 1997 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about the percentage of pollution caused from the different pollutants which were entered in a specific part of the ocean in 1997 and 2007 is given by rendered pie charts.
To begin, After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that in 1997 the maximum proportion of pollution in the ocean was caused by pollutants from air which was followed by Marine whose pollution percentage in the sea was 22. Additionally, offshore oil contributed 5% pollution in the ocean in the initial year. Surprisingly, same percentage of pollution in the sea was observed from litter and farm waste accounted as 4% from each. Moreover, 17 % pollution was resulted from industrial waste in 1997.
Probing further to the remaining data, domestic sewage and pollutants from Air gave equal proportion of pollution in the sea which was nearly double of the pollution caused by offshore oil, that was observed as 14% in 2007. Strikingly, litter did not affect the ocean because it causes no pollution in the sea in the latter year. The percentile of the pollution caused by Marine and industrial waste was 17 and 9 respectively. Eventually farm waste produce only a tiny proportion of the pollution in the ocean, constituted as 2%.
Overall, the percentage of the pollution caused by all given pollutants were decreased from 1997 to 2007, except domestic sewage and offshore oil which started polluting Ocean at a higher rate.
- More and more people do online shopping Why is this the situation what is the effect of online shopping on shops and community 84
- The chart below shows the average amount of time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles in the US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the average prices of tickets sold at a theatre and the and the bar chart show the average percentage of tickets sold in 2010 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 69
- Nanaannw
- Some people use technology for taking advice related to medical problems rather than going to doctor Why is this so what do you think is positive or negative development 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01687763713 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82864245431 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46835443038 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0214871781 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202252479443 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106070774438 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730364661447 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176379382478 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749595060322 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.