The two plans show Pancha village in 2005 and 2015. Write a summary of the information. Select and report the main features, and make comparisons when necessary.
The given pictures illustrate the comparison in the structure of Pancha village between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it is clear that the village witnessed a huge change in terms of housing, road infrastructure, education, religious institutions, and electric nets. The village became more modernized and well-equipped after the transformation.
In 2005, there was a dirt road scattered with potholes running from the north to the south of the map. On the left side of the road, there was a residential area and an unordered market occupied, respectively. Simultaneously, on the opposite side, a primary school with two main buildings was constructed in the north-east of map, while an area of pagodas was situated in the south-east. However, there was a line of houses located between them.
After 10 years, the previous road was destroyed and replaced by a new asphalt one with a line of power along the left-side and traffic signs on the right side. Additionally, most houses had been able to pick up TV signals due to the construction of a satellite system on the south-west of the map. However, two of three houses on the east side had been demolished. Besides, after upgrading the facilities, the school then functioned as a primary and secondary school. The similar development also happened to the area for pagodas by adding one more. Finally, the outdoor market was expanded and became more organized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-04 | ryannguyen0303 | 73 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 95
- the table shows the average weekly salaries of men and women working in different occupations 78
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, however, second, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11206896552 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02388431288 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5990998256 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2307692308 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821911520481 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335545966958 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610805990202 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084126557715 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876628065376 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.