The table shows data regarding the underground railways in 6 cities with respect to their age, length, and numbers of passengers per year.
Overall, the 6 selected cities span a wide range of underground systems with London’s subway being both the oldest and longest, while Tokyo’s underground railway serves by far the highest number of passengers per year.
The London underground railway dates back to 1863, making it the oldest subway system in the table followed by the Paris underground, which opened in 1900. In contrast, Los Angeles has the youngest underground railway of the 6 cities, dating back to only 2001. However, while London and Paris also have the longest subway systems, with 394 and 199 km respectively, Los Angeles is only the second shortest at 28 km. The shortest underground railway belongs to Kyoto (11 km).
Regarding the numbers of passengers served, Tokyo’s is by far the busiest subway with 1927 million passengers per year, despite having less than half the length of railway compared to London underground railway, which transports only 775 million people per year.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- underground railway systems 56
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bers of passengers per year. Overall, the 6 selected cities span a wide range ...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubway being both the oldest and longest, while Tokyo's underground railway s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27932960894 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75188295053 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3515682727 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397124821933 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226026898442 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120025242605 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252323367254 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793480787619 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.