The given table indicates the variety of qualified workers in millions from the year 1995 to 2020. General speaking, the forecasting of low qualified employees by the year 2020 has the most significant rate.
As the table shows, The low qualification level has a gradual increase while the no qualification rate of employees fall down sharply. Regarding the table information, the no qualification rate varied from 6 million to 2.5 million. Besides the low qualification level rise from 10.5 to 13.5.
The given information about a degree or postgraduate qualification rate claimed that there has been a sharp rise in number from 5 million to about 9.5 and it contains a lot of changes. In contrast, intermediate qualification number has small changes. Also, between 2005 and 2010 it remains steady.
To conclude, based on The data, provided by the table The number of qualified workers has a significant growth in general between 1995 and 2020.
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 55
- With an increasing population communication via the internet and text messaging face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extend do you agree? 67
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of often products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 56
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03730533949 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.603710818 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320246730507 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160510538989 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.219020619097 0.0843802449381 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236327875798 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.228077035093 0.0819641961636 278% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.