Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994
Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map shows the development of the village.
The map shows the growth of a village called Chorleywood between 1868 and 1994.
It is clear that the village grew as the transport infrastructure was improved. Four periods of development are shown on the map, and each of the populated areas is near to the main roads, the railway or the motorway.
From 1868 to 1883, Chorleywood covered a small area next to one of the main roads. Chorleywood Park and Golf Course is now located next to this original village area. The village grew along the main road to the south between 1883 and 1922, and in 1909 a railway line was built crossing this area from west to east. Chorleywood station is in this part of the village.
The expansion of Chorleywood continued to the east and west alongside the railway line until 1970. At that time, a motorway was built to the east of the village, and from 1970 to 1994, further development of the village took place around motorway intersections with the railway and one of the main roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-13 | Hanabi | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-31 | ansh_123 | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | 0935670471 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | Awadhesh Mourya | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-23 | mrinal | 73 | view |
- It is more important for the government to spend money on promoting the healthy lifestyle to prevent the illness rather than on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 95
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74157303371 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63470568206 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.852503295 43.030603864 262% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 211.0 112.824112599 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 22.9334400587 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157936615289 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927961011229 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728353733331 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119727532857 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113490496825 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.2329268293 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.1 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.