When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has
nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the
quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your
position.
We always see many people all over the world who are very successful in their profession. In addition, a huge number of books in libraries are about methods of being successful. Successful people and books of success say that hardworking is key point of success. In my opinion, although hardworking is requisite of success, it is not quite possible without chance. I the following I explain my arguments.
Hardworking has to be in a correct direction. There is an Iranian proverb that says that sometimes you try a lot in order to climb a wall and you are doing all your effort. Unfortunately, you don’t know that you selected a wrong wall. In other word, you work hard but you are not lucky to choose the best direction to achieve your goal. Otherwise you waste too much time.
Furthermore, some people are not in good environment, family, or district to be success. For example, imagine some Indians who live in very poor families. They don’t have enough money even for food and cloth. In addition, there is no suitable job to help them in order to improve their life styles. In this situation, hardworking might not be enough for success. Because, you were not so lucky to grow up in a normal circumstance.
In summary, I think hardworking is the key point of success but it is not enough. You have to be lucky to grow up in good circumstance. Moreover, you should have a good chance to choose the suitable way in order to be success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-22 | Imankhatami | 67 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places Why do you think people visit museums Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students Which point of view do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 56
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...he best direction to achieve your goal. Otherwise you waste too much time. Furthermore...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orking might not be enough for success. Because, you were not so lucky to grow up in a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in summary, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65369649805 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74018932315 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540856031128 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1831202324 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.9473684211 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.5263157895 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157375817354 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047363415509 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424395236019 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943915938462 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439150116832 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.