The line graph illustrates the proportion of female parliament members in five different nations in Europe between 2000 and 2012
In general, the figures for almost nations increased in all the time surveyed. In addition, Germany and Italy were two nations where the percentage of female members of parliament were higher than that of other countries.
In the year 2000, around 23% of parliament members in Italy was female, compared with over 36% in Germany. By 2012, the percentage of female members of parliament in Italy had increased to reach a peak of over 37% in 2010. In comparison. the figures for Germany were lower than that of Italy in almost the period except for the period from 2010 to 2012. Similar to Italy, the proportion of female parliament members in Germany was on a rise to reach the highest point at the end of the period, at nearly 40%.
Likewise, the 12-year period witnessed a sharp rise in the percentage of women taking charge in parliament in France and the UK. Over 3% and 26% of parliament members were women in France and the UK respectively. The figures for both nations had been on an increase for the next 12 years to reach a peak of over 33% and 23% in France and the UK in turn in 2012. By contrast. the rate for Belgium was 15% in 2000, and then rose to nearly 25% in 2008 before declining to under 23% in the final year.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: anna lee
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...to reach a peak of over 37% in 2010. In comparison. the figures for Germany were lower tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...eak of over 37% in 2010. In comparison. the figures for Germany were lower than tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nd the UK in turn in 2012. By contrast. the rate for Belgium was 15% in 2000, and t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, then, except for, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53036437247 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46903822336 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449392712551 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2527385837 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225472163176 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883092467791 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658517173915 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160073863277 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577097312363 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.