The chart gives information about the quantity of queries got by the Tourist information office about in one city over six months in 2011.
Over, it is clear that the inquiries from person and telephone tended to rise over the period, while there was an opposite trend which could be seen in letter/email. Besides, we witnessed a dramatic growth by person’s enquiries compared to remaining form.
In Jan, Telephone was the form that Tourist information office received the most, at about 900, followed by letter/email and person, at nearly 790 and 410 respectively. Over the next month, the number of queries got by telephone decreased slightly by 100 before recovering at 1000 in Mar, whereas the figure for letter/email remained at the same frame time. By contrast, the person’s enquiries received by Office doubled after two months.
Over the following month, the quantity of queries from people continued to skyrocket significantly and surpassed telephone to rank first, with figures 1900. Likewise, enquiries by telephone was a steep growth and reaching a peak at 1600, while the figure for letter/email witnessed decrease its all-time low of 390 in May and Jun.
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, likewise, may, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19473684211 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82709976386 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4295124178 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207525130486 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102736581147 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112571824951 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158549661685 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136969526402 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.