It is true that the number of students who pursue the science sector is becoming inadequate in a lot of countries in the world nowadays. The essay below will analyze some explanations for this situation as well as its influence on society.
There are two primary reasons why most students do not choose this field. First, these subjects are usually more difficult and demanding, which requires students to put much effort into their studies. For example, my friend who is doing a course in Biology said that he has to perform too many experiments and complete numerous different projects, which would make him do not have any free time. As a result, science subjects seem to be less attractive to students compared to economics or business-related subjects. Secondly, employment opportunities in this particular field are limited and extremely competitive. Therefore, learners are less likely to decide to select these majors, instead, they tend to choose other subjects which allow them to find jobs more easily.
A shortage of learners in science fields can result in some negative effects. The first impact is the imbalance between the number of students who study science and other majors. More specifically, there are very few students studying science, while the remaining majors such as engineering or economics tend to be the opposite. This leads to an imbalance in the future workforce. In addition, the lack of human resources in this field will affect greatly the development of each country. Because there is not enough force to conduct scientific research as well as the quality of expertise is not high. This might contribute to reducing the country's ability to develop science and technology.
In conclusion, the shortage of students choosing science subjects is caused by several factors, and this problem might bring about serious impacts.
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity 73
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...rform too many experiments and complete numerous different projects, which would make him do not h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce and other majors. More specifically, there are very few students studying sci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76422382114 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9006961786 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234183787366 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697641684135 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498005565057 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141953651064 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272171311341 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.