Given is a line chart providing information about the amount of waste produced by three different companies between 2000 and 2015. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the amount of waste resulting from companies A and B experienced a downward trend, meanwhile, the number of litters produced by company A showed a significant rise.
In 2000, as many as 12 tons of litter were produced by company A, decreasing by approximately 1 ton of waste in every next two years and Finishing the given period at around 8 tonnes in 2015. Conversely, the number of litters resulting from company A was the lowest (around 4 tonnes) in the initial year, and then the figure rose by about 1 or 2 tonnes in the next 2 years. Finally, the number then reached the highest figure (approximately 10 tonnes) in 2015.
The amount of waste resulting from company B was the second place (around 8 tonnes) in the first reported year, experiencing a drastic change to about 11 tonnes in the following years and then it slumped to around 3 tonnes in the final year.
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants measured in million tonnes from three different sources between 1990 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative trend 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n the next 2 years. Finally, the number then reached the highest figure approximatel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68817204301 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74212523063 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8898225875 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175379429112 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988773314895 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590883210403 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135179074905 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468608603102 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.