The line graph demonstrates the average spending on handheld phone and landline phone services annually from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that over time spending the amount of money that was used to service the cell phones increasing, while in the case of the residential phones opposite trend was observed.
In 2001, 200 dollars was utilized to service the cell phone, while residential phones cost 700 dollars which were three times than cell phones. In the next year, 100 dollars was increased in the case of mobile phones, on the other, in the case of hand residential phones, the service price climbed down to 650. Then the price gradually upgraded for cell phones and the opposite happened to home landline phones.
In 2006, the lines of price were crossed each other which was approximately 540 dollars. In the later year, the servicing money increased to 600 dollars, whereas residential went down to 480 dollars. Then rest of the period the amount of money of mobile phone services rose linearly and ended at close to 800 dollars. On the contrary, in 2010, homeland phone service prices decreased to 400 dollars.
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The government should control the Internet to reduce cyber crime and ensure safety of users To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extend do you agree 61
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40033966477 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517948717949 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1297304165 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24479458181 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119550010356 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955137811072 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189439232362 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869075511173 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.