The line graph illustrates the total number of yearly visits to Australia by a foreign citizen. However, the tabular chart demonstrates the five different countries(South Korea, Japan, China, the USA, Britain, Europe) people went to Australia for visiting from 1975 to 2005. The data is calibrated in millions.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number of overseas tourists in Australia increased over the period of time. However, the highest number of travellers came from Japan; the least amount of tourists Came from China.
Have a glance at the line graph, from 1975 to 1985, there was a slight rise in the visitors, increased 10million to roughly 15million. Then, this number grew gradually and reached nearly 25 million in 1995, after which hike moderately and touch the all-time highest figure above 30 million by 2005.
In the year 1975, 8.8 million people visited Australia from all over the world. The majority of people came from Japan(3.2 million). This figure was roughly three times more than European(1.1 million). South Korean came in second place, and around 2.9 million visitors visited Australia annually. Remain three countries(The UK, The USA, China) people visited by below 1 million. After three decades, the total number of visitors came to Australia was 30.4 million. Twelve million of visitor came from Japan, which was highest. Whereas the least amount of tourists came from China(0.8 million). 4.5 million of European came to visits Australia. While South Korean visitors were 9.1 million, this figure was two times more than European. Visitors came from China, The USA, and The UK was 0.8 million, 1.1 million and 2.9 million respectively.
- Some people think that it is more important lo plant trees in open areas of towns and cities than to build more housing to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 67
- The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 100
- The diagram below shows how electricity is produced in a nuclear power station 74
- The chart shows tea and coffee consumption in 2015 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ourists in Australia increased over the period of time. However, the highest number of travell...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 521, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tor came from Japan, which was highest. Whereas the least amount of tourists came from ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21611721612 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48711744732 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3847079248 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1111111111 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199508287147 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847395918287 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401051086769 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129277919543 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327631022657 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.