The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart presents information about the percentages of divorces in Finland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015. Overall, Sweden experienced a downward trend, while Finland showed an upward trend throughout the period. Both countries’s divorce rates had some fluctuations. Although Finland initially had a lower rate, it outraced Sweden at the end of the period.
Sweden’s divorce rate was about 45% in 2011, being higher than Finland’s rate by approximately 8%. Then, it rose to almost fifty percent in 2012. However, the figure showed a gradual decrease to about 47% in 2013, and continued to decline steadily to the end of the period, reaching around 45% in 2014 and hitting a low-point of about 37% in 2015.
Percentage of divorces in Finland was less than 40% in 2011, and it decreased in 2012, when about one third of marriages in Finland ended with a divorce (as opposed to almost a half in Sweden). However, the figure experienced a steady growth during the next two years. It rose to approximately 39% in 2013, then increased by around 3% in 2014, and remained steady for the next year, outracing the rate of Sweden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | ThaoVannn07 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015. Overall, Sweden experienced a downward t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raced Sweden at the end of the period. Sweden’s divorce rate was about 45% in 2...
^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tting a low-point of about 37% in 2015. Percentage of divorces in Finland was le...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 192.0 206.0 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03125 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02592960923 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567708333333 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3961176911 44.8134815571 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 4.34317383033 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155603003582 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699387213634 0.0766984524023 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509706255622 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113744058113 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346401106154 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.