The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the proportions of British people who donated their money to charity (by) IN TERMS OF five diffirent age groups over two separate years, 1990 and 2010.
Overall, a larger percentage of people in the 36-50 age group donated to charity in 1990 but the 51-65 age group in 2010 compared to the others. It is also clear that there was a significant decrease in the figures for THOSE WHO AGED FROM 18-50. By contrast, the figures for people aged over 51 increased considerably.
In 1990, the NUMBER of people who were 36-50 years old was the highest, accouting for nearly 45%. This figure was approximately three times as high as that of the 18-25 age group. In comparision, the figures for people aged from 26-35 and over 51 were also lower but higher than the 18-25-year-old people’s figure, in the range of 30-35%.
In 2010, there was a 5% rocket in figure for people aged OVER 51 with the 51-65 age group’s figure surpassing the 36-50 age group to become the highest (figure) in that year, around 40%. Meanwhile, the remaining age groups witnessed a substantial slump to well over 5% FOR 18-25, just under 25% FOR 26-35 and 35% FOR 36-50.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igure, in the range of 30-35%. In 2010, there was a 5% rocket in figure for peop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65533980583 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47384756291 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2286743198 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 16.8248392259 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 4.34317383033 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19723971431 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105072065652 0.0766984524023 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468005653293 0.0603063233224 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151513372993 0.12726935374 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265477720743 0.0580467560999 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.