The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
The bar chart illustrates the information about the amount of waste disposed of by three separate methods in particular European country between 2005 and 2008.
Overall, while the quantities of refused using landfill and dumping in sea saw a considerable decrease, the opposite trend was true for burning method over the given period. Additionally, the way disposed waste by burying was more preferred than any other method counterparts.
According to the bar chart, the amount of refuse treated by landfill, which stood at exactly 1800 miliion of tonnes, was 30 times as much as that of disposed by dumping in sea, at only 600 million of tonnes in 2005. By contrast, incineration recorded the lowest point of all three waste disposal with only 500 million of tonnes.
It can be clearly to seen that, there was a two-fold fall in the figure for burying refuse from 1200 million of tonnes in 2006 to 600 million of tonnes, making it the most second method. By contrast, burning waste experienced a dramatic rise to approximately 900 million of tonnes, exceeding landfill refuse to become the first ranking at the end of the timescale. Also, a slight growth was observed in the amount of refuse treated by dumping in sea to 650 million of tonnes, followed by an remarkable fall to nearly 550 million of tonnes in 2008.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 61
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 64
- the chart below show the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 58
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 489, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...a to 650 million of tonnes, followed by an remarkable fall to nearly 550 million o...
^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o nearly 550 million of tonnes in 2008.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 225.0 206.0 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90222222222 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65182536713 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7552443706 44.8134815571 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.875 76.5299724578 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 16.8248392259 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 4.34317383033 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157292201474 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816093963957 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918997980422 0.0603063233224 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128616873627 0.12726935374 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108934749672 0.0580467560999 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 8.37731958763 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 70.7449484536 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.