the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
The two pie charts illustrate the information about how the percentage of the energy manufactured from separate resources transforms in particular country in 1985 and 2003.
Overall, while the percentage of nuclear and oil saw a significant decrease, an exponential growth was experienced in the proportion of natural gas, coal and other renewable, with a noticeable exception for hydro, which remained steady over the given period. However, oil was the most popular resource to produce energy in both recorded years.
According to two pie charts, oil was recorded the first ranking in 1985, at 52% and then it dropped significantly to 39% in 2003, yet it still remained the most popular resource among 6 separate resources. The percentage of nuclear made of 22% in 1985, followed by the approximately threefold fall in 2003, at 8%. By contrast, energy produced by hydro remained unchanged in both year 1985 and 2003.
It can be clearly to seen that, the percentage of other renewable accounted for only 1%, which was the lowest percentage in 1985, before a remarkable increase in 2003, at 4%. 22% of coal was observed in 1985, outpacing the figure in 2003 by 14%. Likewise, the proportion of natural gas being the third ranking in 1985, at 13%, exceeded that of coal to become the second popular resource, at 23% at the end of the given period.
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
- People think that children nowadays have more freedom To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
- the table below shows the amount of waste production millions of tons in six different countries over the twenty year period Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 64
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 23% at the end of the given period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, second, so, still, then, third, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 937.175257732 121% => OK
No of words: 227.0 206.0 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97797356828 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79821347319 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541850220264 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 290.88556701 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 1.44329896907 624% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.084236515 44.8134815571 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 76.5299724578 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 16.8248392259 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 4.34317383033 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266961176731 0.216113520407 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127270445922 0.0766984524023 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866527778226 0.0603063233224 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182095725912 0.12726935374 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884845677565 0.0580467560999 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 8.62886597938 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.