The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso

The two pie charts provide information regarding to the ability of British students in speaking other languages at a university in 2000 and 2010.

At first, by comparing figures in 2000 and 2010, it seems that being familiar with languages in two comparing years had broadly 5% increment or stayed in the same figure. However, the ability of knowing languages soared partially by moving to the year 2010, because speaking no other languages dipped from 20% to 10%.

Knowing German and two other languages had obviously the same proportions (10%), and the figures of French language with another languages were similar in the year 2000. Interestingly, speaking Spanish with unfamiliarity with any language dedicated 50% of the chart to themselves at the same year. Turning to the year 2010, French, German and having no second language skill had the equal percents (10%), and others, ranging from Spanish, another language, and two other languages had the first to third positions respectively.

To sum up, majority of language known by students have either 5% fluctuation or no change, and furthermore, the ability of knowing other languages are increased totally in contrast with the year 2000.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, regarding, second, so, third, in contrast, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23316062176 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72583183614 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 290.88556701 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0688035833 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 76.5299724578 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 16.8248392259 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 4.34317383033 266% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236938690494 0.216113520407 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144942687116 0.0766984524023 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091507748511 0.0603063233224 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191194382547 0.12726935374 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991023385149 0.0580467560999 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 8.37731958763 203% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 8.71597938144 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.