The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010.
The given pie chart illustrates the percentage of other languages spoken at one university by British students during the year 2000 and 2010.
On a glance of the given chat, for the year 2000 around 30% of students spoke Spanish. German and French were the second highest spoken language accounting to 15% and German and two other languages at 10%. 20 % of the students spoke no other language other than English. During the year 2010, Spanish was the highest spoken language by students followed by another language at 20% and two other languages at 15%. French, German, no other languages accounted for or 10% in the same year.
When comparing both the charts Spanish speakers have risen to 35% and still remains at the peak followed by another language at 20% during the year 2010. French and German speakers have fallen to 10% and also a 10% decrease in no other language speakers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | Azrarahamed | 91 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | Azrarahamed | 61 | view |
- Many sports players advertised in sports products.Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say that self-employment is better than a job in a company or an institution. Discuss your opinion and give reasons to support your answer. 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people say that self-employment is better than a job in a company or an institution. Discuss your opinion and give reasons to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
...tudents during the year 2000 and 2010. On a glance of the given chat, for the yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 937.175257732 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 206.0 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79738562092 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3570981356 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 127.690721649 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.0 290.88556701 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6109158361 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 4.34317383033 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289401312041 0.216113520407 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151381810551 0.0766984524023 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920230249928 0.0603063233224 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225051376104 0.12726935374 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073252526692 0.0580467560999 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.