The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari

The pie charts compare the dispersal percentage of British students in one university in England on the basis of their foreign linguistic abilities an 2000 and 2010.

As obviously seen, due to the soaring vogue of the capability of bilingualism or multilingualism, we can witness a substantial dripping of portion of students who know no other language apart from English from 20% in 2000 to its half in 2010. Likewise the popularity of French can be counted as the other major reduction trend by 5% , climbed down to 10% in 2010. Despite of these dramatic drops, the popularity of German seems to remain constant steadily which occupied 10% of pie charts in both years.

On the contrary, we can observe a 5% progress rate in other languages, even in percentage of multilingualism (with 10% at 2000 and 15% in 2010) which have compensated the decreasing patterns of other languages.

In a nutshell, the most popular second language seems to be allocated to Spanish with occupation of almost one-third of total students (30% in 2000 and 35% in 2010), followed by bilinguals who know the extra language other than English and trilingual students with 20% and 15% in 2010 respectively; while the portion of students who know just English has been halved.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...h from 20% in 2000 to its half in 2010. Likewise the popularity of French can be counted...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as the other major reduction trend by 5% , climbed down to 10% in 2010. Despite of...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, second, so, third, while, apart from, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95260663507 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90052152171 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 127.690721649 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 16.3608247423 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.798023611 44.8134815571 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.166666667 76.5299724578 228% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.1666666667 16.8248392259 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.5 4.34317383033 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26280821119 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123436953753 0.0766984524023 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726662580964 0.0603063233224 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163629782715 0.12726935374 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507909102281 0.0580467560999 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 8.37731958763 233% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 7.45979381443 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 8.54432989691 187% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.