The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts give data on the changes of transports which citizens choose to one university between 2004 and 2009
Overall, three of five means of transport experienced a fluctuating trend while other one leveled off. We can see Bus and Car were popular in people
As is presented in the charts, Car was the most using vehicle, account for just over a half in 2004 but this figure declined significantly to nearly 30% in 2009. Meanwhile, Bus was less common than Car, just made up approximately 33% in 2004 but it had an incredible surpass in 2009 which increased to nearly a half of the the chart. A similar trend was seen to Bicycle which just contained 9% in 2004 and upsursing almost double in the next 5 years
In contrast, Train and Walking were two methods not used common, which percentages just consisted of 3 and 4% respectively then saw a slight growth to 4 and 6 %, a tiny fraction in the end of the period mentioned

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-03 anne200 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... while other one leveled off. We can see Bus and Car were popular in people As i...
^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...009 which increased to nearly a half of the the chart. A similar trend was seen to Bicy...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...009 which increased to nearly a half of the the chart. A similar trend was seen to Bicy...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 937.175257732 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52352941176 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6341248244 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.676470588235 0.622605031667 109% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 290.88556701 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 16.3608247423 257% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5213636205 44.8134815571 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 192.25 76.5299724578 251% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.5 16.8248392259 253% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.25 4.34317383033 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139046208393 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839080652175 0.0766984524023 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529905076608 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895664095438 0.12726935374 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619390941588 0.0580467560999 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 8.37731958763 252% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.23 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 7.45979381443 216% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 8.71597938144 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 8.62886597938 214% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 8.54432989691 220% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 19.0 8.15463917526 233% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.