The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist’s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist’s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that Pavilion was the famous spot with the highest percentage of traveller, compared to the others. Also, while the data for tourists to Pavilion and Pier witnessed upward trend, the opposite was true for the others over the period.
In 1980, the percentage of visitors to Festival was 30%, three times as many as that to Pier and it was also higher than that to Pavilion & Art gallery. However, in 1995 the figure for tourist to Pavilion rose remarkably and peaked at approximately 50%. Also, this data in Festival declined to 25% and was at the second places. Pier was still the lowest percentage of tourist attraction.
In 2020, Pavilion witnessed a sharp drop to above 30% but it was the highest data in all destination. There was a dramatic decline to less 10% and was the lowest percentage of people who visited Art gallery.
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 73
- The pie chart below show the result of a survey of children s activities 84
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 78
- The line graph illustrates how many grams of three types of fast food were consumed each week in UK between 1970 and 1990
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88505747126 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66916481625 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7006625825 44.8134815571 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 4.34317383033 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249009887558 0.216113520407 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133426292167 0.0766984524023 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.307036873136 0.0603063233224 509% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275616897868 0.12726935374 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.41852153521 0.0580467560999 721% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 8.71597938144 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.