The given graph illustrates the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions for each person in the four European countries over a period of 40 years from 1967 to 2007. Unit is measured in metric tonnes per person.
Overall, United kingdom produced a greater amount of CO2 emissions compared to other three countries in the surveyed period, although this rate plummeted gradually.
Now, turning to the details, the level of CO2 emissions in Sweden accounted for roughly 9 metric tonnes in 1967. Although it reached a peak in 1977 for approximately 10 metric tonnes, it took a nosedive and reached a slightly more than 5 in 2007.
As it can be clearly observed, the average CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal upsurged sharply, started from 3 and 4 metric tonnes in 1967 to about 5 and 8 metric tonnes in 1997, respectively and then remained steady until 2007.
It is worth to note that despite a preponderance difference in Portugal and Sweden in year 1967, the average rate of CO2 emissions reached a same level for around 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...approximately 10 metric tonnes, it took a nosedive and reached a slightly more than 5 in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ched a slightly more than 5 in 2007. As it can be clearly observed, the average ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81767955801 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66425544458 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 290.88556701 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7133532185 44.8134815571 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 4.34317383033 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242455910701 0.216113520407 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123061505001 0.0766984524023 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553796474595 0.0603063233224 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142385271201 0.12726935374 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621250947302 0.0580467560999 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 8.71597938144 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.