The provided chart compares average amount of CO2 which was emitted in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, United Kingdom produced the highest amount of CO2 in in the mentioned period.
At first, in 1967, United Kingdom CO2 production was about 11 metric tons per person which was the maximum reported number in these 4 figures. Afterwards, this amount remained stable in the first 10 years which was followed by a decline in the following 30 years. However, the volume of CO2 emission in Portugal originally was roughly 1 metric tons in 1967 which was the least volume compared to other countries following which it saw an upward trend.
Moreover, Sweden figure stood at the vicinity of 8 metric tons in 1967 and it raised to just above 10 metric tons as its maximum number in 1977. Next, there was a reduction in the amount of CO2 over the next 30 years as Sweden and Portugal had the same amount of CO2 production in 2007. Conversely, the amount of CO2 which was produced by Italy experienced a surge between 1967 and 1997 after which there was a period of steadiness.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 to 2012. 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...gdom produced the highest amount of CO2 in in the mentioned period. At first, in 1...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73846153846 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41717501285 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 290.88556701 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.3838847595 44.8134815571 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.5 76.5299724578 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 16.8248392259 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175099670741 0.216113520407 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940976929815 0.0766984524023 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640092228487 0.0603063233224 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132748068053 0.12726935374 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596697081334 0.0580467560999 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.