The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011

The line graph illustrates the amount of requests sent by hand, mail and phone to the Tourist Information Office in particular city from January to June in the year 2011
It is clear that the Office received enquiries in person and by cell phone rose significantly over the period of 6 months in 2011, while the number of enquiries sent by letter experienced a considerable drop.
By January, telephone was by far the most popular way, with about 900, as opposed to just nearly 800 through mail or letter. The figure for enquiries received directly from the tourists was much less, just over 400. Between January to March, the number of requests which tourists gave by hand and mobile phone climbed to 1000 and 800 respectively, however, the number of that from email remain relatively stable.
Three months later, from Match to June, there was a rapid increase enquiries sent in person and reached a peak of around 1900 in June. After unchanging in April, the calls from tourist to enquiry went up to almost 1660. By contrast, there was a downward trend in receiving by mail, with just below 400 in the last of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-24 Jonkun 73 view
2019-07-30 thuyngantrinh 73 view
2019-07-30 thuyngantrinh 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73096446701 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46406835714 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0694901557 44.8134815571 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 76.5299724578 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 16.8248392259 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 4.34317383033 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317598432549 0.216113520407 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127770722836 0.0766984524023 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113080597886 0.0603063233224 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19944785826 0.12726935374 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725008696365 0.0580467560999 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 8.37731958763 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 7.45979381443 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 8.62886597938 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.