Life was better when technology was simpler To what extent do you agree and disagree

Essay topics:

Life was better when technology was simpler.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?

It is argued that if technology was not developed, life would be better. This essay totally disagrees with this statement because the development of technology lead to convenient communication and flexible working place and time.
The invention of smart phones and world wide web has been improving the way people communicate to each other. There are numbers of apps that allow people connect to anyone around the world such as Skype, Facetime or Facebook. While before this invention people can only sent mails or made long distance phone calls which costed them a large amount of money, those apps are all free and make the connection faster. For example, I am living in Canada while my parent are in Vietnam. By a simple touch on the screen, I can talk to them and see their face every day which was impossible 20 years ago.
Another reason why technology bring a better life to human is the fact that it allows people to work at home. With a computer that is connected to the Internet, employees can receive their job duties and work anywhere they want. To illustrate, my friend who are living in the US has opened an online course to teach IELTS and his students come from all nations of the world. By introducing this school he can earn a lot of money while he still has time to take care of his family. Besides, his students can study with him and achieve high scores although they are not living in the US.
In conclusion, the development of technology brings the convenience in communication to human and it also allows the flexibility in working.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (32 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-05-26 mohsina 92 view
Essays by user Suri Nguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 937.175257732 137% => OK
No of words: 275.0 206.0 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5157592548 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 127.690721649 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 290.88556701 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.353113904 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 76.5299724578 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104257160136 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439688580216 0.0766984524023 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794826500833 0.0603063233224 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775059809839 0.12726935374 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731988983367 0.0580467560999 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 8.37731958763 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 8.71597938144 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 41.2886597938 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.