The local council is about to destroy children playground in your area because it is under use Write a letter and tell them The importance of this playground Why it is not well used What can be done so more people can use it

Essay topics:

The local council is about to destroy children playground in your area because it is under use. Write a letter and tell them:
• The importance of this playground
• Why it is not well used
• What can be done so more people can use it.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am Roxie Smith – one of the “Mansoon” area residents. I am writing to you with regard to the plan you have recently announced about destruction of the “Plaza” playground.

First of all, I would like to point out the importance of having a play ground in the area. Parents used to take their children there when it was newly built up. Not only it was a great source of entertainment for children, but also it gave their parents the chance of making each other’s acquaintance and forging new relationships.

Sadly, it has been a long time that municipality stopped doing regular maintenance works on the playground. Its facilities are now quite out of order and some of them are even unsafe. Besides, some delinquents gather there in the evenings which in-turn leads parents not to let their children play there.

I believe taking some actions could be practical to make “Plaza” useful again as opposed to taking the easy way and destroying it. I would suggest that you allocate some of your budgets to run a renovation process and facilitate it in a way that it conforms to safety regulations. In addition, it is recommended that some police officers assigned with the task of patrolling there in order to make it a desirable place for families.

Your sincere attention and prompt action are deeply appreciated.

Yours faithfully,

Roxie Smith

Votes
Average: 8.7 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, so, in addition, first of all, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 32.9175257732 88% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 937.175257732 127% => OK
No of words: 235.0 206.0 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06382978723 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14205689047 2.54303337028 124% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 127.690721649 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634042553191 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 290.88556701 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6759059732 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5384615385 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 16.8248392259 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142887780896 0.216113520407 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469402517287 0.0766984524023 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336050918452 0.0603063233224 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662644976157 0.12726935374 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192885402389 0.0580467560999 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 87.0786516854 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.75 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.