Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
With the advantages of technology, the human has shifted to a lifestyle in which individual requirement for delicious food has emerged not just to fulfil the hunger. They want to enjoy a diverse range of foods with a varying taste and for that have invented many new and complex recipes. They want to do it easily and swiftly with the help of modern tools and technology. Has this really improved our lifestyle or has done more harms? Let us examine this in the following essay.
People want to enjoy a diverse type of food - prepare them at home or eat at expensive restaurants. People want to try new cuisines both at home and at restaurants and they want to be served promptly. This is where the modern equipment takes part in, and food preparation nowadays is easier and faster and this has definitely enhanced our lifestyle as it allows us to enjoy food, not just satisfy our tummy.
Moreover, modern tools like the rice cooker, microwave oven, slicer, mixer, electric heater and so on make the cooking process quick and convenient. This saves a great deal of time unlike the past when someone had to be busy all day to prepare meals for the family. People now have more time for recreation, hobbies and for the family. For students, busy corporates, businessmen and researchers, this improvement remarkably enhances their lifestyle.
On the downside, the advancements in food preparation methods have led to the growth of fast food industries and their restaurants pop-up everywhere, like mushrooms after the rain. This might seem convenient for those who do not have time to prepare food at home, but the health hazards are even greater. The obesity rate is skyrocketing in western countries and more people, these days, are suffering from health-related
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-29 | Ramandeep singh jassal | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 937.175257732 157% => OK
No of words: 298.0 206.0 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93959731544 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69702115499 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 127.690721649 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 290.88556701 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0433373345 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 16.8248392259 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 4.34317383033 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183205669677 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607222774745 0.0766984524023 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502880576199 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107618314673 0.12726935374 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389130794062 0.0580467560999 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 41.2886597938 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.