The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by Charities in the US, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010
The given table data present the cost of United States, EU countries and other countries has invested which technology of developing countries between 2006 and 2010.
As is observed thể amount of finding from countries has increased over the years. USA was the most finance in the remaining countries. Whereas EU and other countries are equivalent.
Firstly, The USA donated the most with 9.7 billions in 2006, over the past half of the total of other countries was 15,7 billions. Morever, the figures of USA and total is experienced a constant rise in over the last year's later. In 2007 the money was donated added about 0.8 billions,0.3 billions in 2008, 4.5 billions in 2009 and just over 4.5 billions in 2010 by US. Besides, total of all countries augmented similarly from 15.7 billions to 30 billions. And in the future, will definitely bé higher.
The number of money for investment of EU and other countries increased similarly between 2006 and 2008. But there is fluctuation in 2009. EU countries has deceased 0.1 billions and 0.5 billions in other countries. And went up against in 2020
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-30 | nguyenthanhlam | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | nguyenthanhlam | 100 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by Charities in the US EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by Charities in the US EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 100
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by Charities in the US EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given table data present the cost of...
^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...loping countries between 2006 and 2010. As is observed thể amount of finding from ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oping countries between 2006 and 2010. As is observed thể amount of finding fro...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...EU and other countries are equivalent. Firstly, The USA donated the most with 9...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the future, will definitely bé higher. The number of money for investment of EU...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 206.0 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9247311828 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61288110084 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.231773811 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.4615384615 76.5299724578 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3076923077 16.8248392259 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 4.34317383033 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.94845360825 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431675284667 0.216113520407 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147794810223 0.0766984524023 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15612057003 0.0603063233224 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312696987457 0.12726935374 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139559117735 0.0580467560999 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 8.37731958763 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 70.7449484536 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 7.45979381443 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.