It is obvious that massive car usage has caused global warming and other negative impacts on people's health and well-being. This essay will discuss about ways to overcome the problem.
Firstly, the way to overcome this growing number of car usage is by improving the current public transportation. Previously, a lot of people may feel uncomfortable using public transportation thus they choose to save money and buy their own cars. By providing a great and comfortable public transportation, people will not feel reluctant to switch from personal car to public transportation. As a result, the number of car usage can be reduced and several problems caused by it will be overcame.
Secondly, the other way to solve this problem is by increasing the car tax. If the car tax is increased, people will think twice before buying a car because it will make them spend more money than they should have spent. Moreover, owning a car itself already needs a lot maintenance fee, so the increasing car tax will only make people unwilling to buy a car. Finally, the number of car usage can be minimized which can prevent other problems to happen.
In conclusion, the problem with massive car usage can be overcame through two ways, improving the current public transportation and increasing the car tax.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 4.92783505155 244% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 32.9175257732 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 217.0 206.0 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00921658986 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8489923884 2.54303337028 112% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.471375663 44.8134815571 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8181818182 76.5299724578 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 4.34317383033 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303492017515 0.216113520407 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129160989662 0.0766984524023 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633391572329 0.0603063233224 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194630604647 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293509476869 0.0580467560999 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.