In this modern era, sharing information is something that is commonly done between people. Some people opine that it is acceptable to share information where others opine that information should be protected. I completely agree with both views and will explain the reasons.
On the one side, information should be shared because it can help others progressing. Some people may need information that we have in order to accomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, we will help them to get what they want to achieve. For instance, a thesis advisor has done research in the same topic with what her thesis student chooses. In order to help her thesis student to finish her thesis, she shared the information about her research as a reference. As a result, this information has helped her thesis student to finish his thesis faster.
On the other hand, protecting information that we have is also important. This is because, some information are not easily obtained. Thus, it is best to protect them to respect the owner of the information and to maintain the value of an information. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to working performance among Canada employees. Because the information about this topic is still rare and he did that research with a lot of efforts, he does not want this information to be shared carelessly so people will appreciate his effort. He then decided to make it as a paid-version journal on a repository site, so only those who are really interested about this information can pay and read about his journal.
In conclusion, I agree that sharing information is good because it can help others progressing while protecting information is also necessary because some information are not easily acquired.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ccomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, we will help them to get what ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ormation. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, really, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02675585284 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84607720894 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4018040066 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283432693474 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111128763258 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739267236769 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212806799166 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480726568903 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.