The two given charts illustrate data about getting to work in the city Houston Texas While the table gives details about the percentage of travellers per form of transport and the average age of them

Essay topics:

The two given charts illustrate data about getting to work in the city Houston, Texas. While the table gives details about the percentage of travellers per form of transport and the average age of them,

The two given charts illustrate data about getting to work in the city Houston, Texas. While the table gives details about the percentage of travellers per form of transport and the average age of them, the bar chart compares the amount of CO2 emissions from different means of transport.
Overall, we can see clearly that cars with drivers only made up the largest percentage in the table and it is also a mode of transportation that emits the highest amount of CO2 per person per kilometre.
According to the table, cars with more than one person (average of 44 years old) occupied 11% of the proportion of people that commute by each form of transport. The percentage of people aged average of 39 years old who prefered cycling and walking hit the lowest data of only 4 percent, while that of the older people who chose to travel by train or bus was 37%. The highest proportion of the table belonged to cars with just the driver with 48% of the totals.
Looking at the bar chart, it is clear that cycling or walking and travelling by train or bus has almost no emissions at all which is extremely good for our environment. By contrast, cars emit a lot of CO2, especially cars with one person only, it emits over 0.3 kilograms per person per kilometre.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-26 giakhanhsm99@gmail.com 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 937.175257732 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 206.0 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56637168142 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47311489472 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544247787611 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 290.88556701 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9879244793 44.8134815571 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 16.8248392259 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 4.34317383033 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379504422198 0.216113520407 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174577330788 0.0766984524023 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186201843913 0.0603063233224 309% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25921958646 0.12726935374 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.281092290616 0.0580467560999 484% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 7.45979381443 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 937.175257732 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 206.0 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56637168142 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47311489472 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544247787611 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 290.88556701 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9879244793 44.8134815571 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 16.8248392259 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 4.34317383033 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379504422198 0.216113520407 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174577330788 0.0766984524023 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186201843913 0.0603063233224 309% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25921958646 0.12726935374 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.281092290616 0.0580467560999 484% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 7.45979381443 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.