Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
There is an increasing number of people who consider that we should build modern buildings instead of the older ones because of modern society as well as overpopulation, while others do not agree. In my opinion, preserving historic buildings is significant and necessary.
Some people who support keeping classic buildings consider that historic buildings witnessed the changes of our nation and are the evidence of our history. For educational purposes, we should not only let our future generations obtain history from books or teachers, but also make them gain practical knowledge from practical activities (field visits/ educational trips) such as visiting historic buildings to see vivid images about our history. What we acquired from our history are the unique treasures for our offspring. Furthermore, historic buildings were built and left by our ancestors, which are a mark of their wisdom, innovation, and creativity. It is really a pity that those buildings could pass the tests of time and nature but to be eventually demolished by human beings. In addition, we can memorialise our ancestors forever by reserving old buildings.
It is undeniable that historic buildings prevent us from solving the housing shortage problem and cannot satisfy the trend of overpopulation in cities. Moreover, the old buildings cannot match up well with the modern stylish buildings, which may influence a city’s aesthetic feature. However, these problems can be addressed by other methods such as improving the countryside’s living conditions, building modern buildings in certain areas instead of situating around the old among other solutions. Demolishing historic buildings does not have long-term benefits overall.
In conclusion, benefits brought by old, historic buildings override the drawbacks resulting from them. Therefore, I support the preservation of such buildings.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-11 | tahmeed20192020 | 61 | view |
2018-04-01 | nooraleslam2011 | 86 | view |
2017-05-16 | Nugman | 89 | view |
2015-11-26 | lzhong47s | 80 | view |
2015-11-26 | lzhong47s | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the monthly expenditure on three types of restaurant food in Australia The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015 63
- some people think we have the moral right to use animals for human needs, while others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 70
- some people think personal happiness is directly related to economic success, while others believe this depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 80
- Some people believe that studying in a college or university is the best way for students to prepare for their future career Others think they should leave school as soon as possible to develop their career through work experience Discuss both views and g 70
- The plot shows the annual number of restaurant visits for the same types of food between 1965 and 2015. 50
flaws:
No. of Words: 284 350 //You may put one more paragraph to get higher marks.
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1555 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.475 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.839 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.903 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.39 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.583 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.195 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5