Some people say that the government should invest in trains and the subway system to prevent traffic congestion in large cities. Others, however, think it should build wider roads. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples.
Transportation world has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades. Presently, majority of people have tendency to use their personal vehicles and therefore traffic has been a gigantic concern in this jet age of 21st century. Some people assert that investing in trains and subways could be the right treatment to this problem. By contrast, constructing extensive roads is the worthwhile solution to overcome this situation in other’s opinion. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my perception.
Multifarious points can be mentioned to shore up the former view. First and ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-07 | Lanter Habert | 73 | view |
- Nowadays many people are diagnosed with anorexia what do you think the causes of this are? What can be done to improve the situation? 89
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past. What are the main reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development? 81
- Some people believe that a vertical city inwhich people work and live in tall buildings isa good idea. Others say that horizontal livingis better. Discuss both views and express youropinion 90
- Some people think that higher salary is important when choosing a company to work for, while others think that good atmosphere at a workplace is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion with relevant examples. 80
- Nowadays, people care about their appearance more than before. Do you agree or disagree? 93
is likely to ensure the more space under the ground
is likely to ensure more space under the ground
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'apart from', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Performance in Part of Speech:
Noun ratios: 0.272493573265 112% 112%
Ratio of verbs: 0.151670951157 96%
Ratio of adjectives: 0.0874035989717 91%
Ratio of pronouns: 0.025706940874 61%
Ratio of prepositions: 0.120822622108 98%
Ratio of participles: 0.0411311053985 98%
Ratio of conjunctions: 0.0154241645244 49%
Ratio of infinitives: 0.0462724935733 147%
Ratio of particles: 0.0025706940874 211%
Ratio of determiners: 0.113110539846 127%
Ratio of modal_auxiliary: 0.025706940874 108%
Ratio of WH_determiners: 0.00514138817481 38%
Performance in vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2168.0 117%
No of words: 351.0 116%
Chars per words: 6.15909090909 101%
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 104%
Ratio of words length more than 5 chars: 0.356125356125 121%
Ratio of words length more than 6 chars: 0.264957264957 115%
Ratio of words length more than 7 chars: 0.188034188034 112%
Ratio of words length more than 8 chars: 0.128205128205 112%
Word Length SD: 2.8333043275 102%
Unique words: 217.0 128%
Unique words percentage: 0.618233618234 110%
Word variations: 74.3196431377 123%
How many sentences: 21.0 142%
Sentence length: 16.7142857143 78%
Sentence length SD: 28.0270358623 61%
Chars per sentence: 122.387096774 143%
Words per sentence: 19.814516129 141%
Ratio of Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 81%
Paragraphs: 5.0 111%
Language errors: 0.0 0%
Consistency: 0.38824738495 94%
Readability: 16.7897721146 78%
Elegance: 2.03614457831 120%
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 351 350
No. of Characters: 1769 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.328 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.04 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.73 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.256 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.489 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5