Some people think that young people should be free to choose the career they like while others think that they should think more realistically about their future. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Decisions related to career require a greal of thinking and knowledge exploration about working fields. Presently, some people assert that giving freedom to youngsters for choosing the career of their choice is necessary. Others, however, advice youthful generation to have profound rational thinking before taking decisions related to career. This essay intends to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are multifarious points to endorse the former view. First and the foremost, individuals choosing the career of their interests perform Outstandingly in their respective fields. This ensures the chances of great accomplishments. To demonstrate, youngsters are expected to be self-driven while working in the field of their own interest. They work more passionately and bring out their maximum internal potential to achieve their goals. Besides this, liking towards profession always stimulates one to make innovations and have willingness to look for persistent improvement in the working skills. Needless to say, the idea of choosing career on the basis of interest deserves appreciation. On the contrary, others have contrasting argument. Taking a real life example into consideration, M.S Dhoni, an eminent cricketer, had profound interest in cricket sport. He got a government job which is well paid but later determined to quit his job and establish himself as an international cricketer. His interest and passion towards the game installed spirit of emulation in M.S Dhoni and he took greatest heights of success throughout his cricket career. The advantage of choosing career on the behalf of interest is thus very clear.
They think that realistic thinking is of huge significance in case of making impeccable decisions related to career. To be specific, thinking realistically allows an individual to understand his own strength and resourcefulness. In this way, better analysis made after rational thinking enables a person to choose a job which is perfect fit for him or her. Hence, rational thinking is extremely imperative for making a decision about career. Making things more clear by putting a real life example, earlier, my cousin, Harmeet, wanted to become a doctor. But his performance in science was not up to the mark. Infact, medical studies are Very expensive in my country and therefore it is not easily affordable by those belonging to middle class families. Taking such situations into consideration under rational thinking, he changed his mind and decided to become interior designer. Nowadays, he is quite happy with his decision and it is the outcome realistic thinking.
To recapitulate, undeniably, interest matters a lot while making a choice for the career. However, we can never underestimate the importance of thinking about future realistically. In my perception, both the approaches should be examined deliberately before coming to a conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...real life example into consideration, M.S Dhoni, an eminent cricketer, had profou...
^
Line 3, column 1077, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...game installed spirit of emulation in M.S Dhoni and he took greatest heights of s...
^
Line 3, column 1092, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'took the greatest'.
Suggestion: took the greatest
...spirit of emulation in M.S Dhoni and he took greatest heights of success throughout his crick...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 447.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51230425056 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06442949754 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572706935123 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4041811202 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9642857143 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290362133563 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692189103067 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065831290934 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176310166707 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348215723797 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.