Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In today's world, the use of technology is ever-increasing. Even in classrooms technology can be commonly seen. It is disagreed that technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyzing both the inability of a teacher drive technology to discipline students in a classroom as well as this robotic teacher's hindrance to a student's learning process will show this.
Firstly, a teacher powered by artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its students. For example, it is commonly understood that children require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are indeed completing their class work and not fooling around during class time. Unfortunately this is something that a robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why technology will never completely replace the teacher in the classroom.
Secondly, a robotic teacher would disrupt a student's learing process and in effect slow a student's ability to absorb information from lessons. For instance, kids require motivation to be taught effectively. Such is a quality human teachers possess but technologically driven instructor do not. From this it becomes quite evident that robotic instructors will never take the place of real teachers in a classroom.
In summary, a robotic teacher lacks the discipline needed to instruct students properly and actually operates to retard a student's ablilty to learn new information. Thus it is clear why the idea of having a class run entirely by a machine cannot be supported. After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the depate over computerized teaching will forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-09 | chinnusalas | 73 | view |
| 2015-08-08 | Ahmad Habib | 70 | view |
Analyzing both the inability of a teacher drive technology to discipline students in a classroom as well as this robotic teacher's hindrance to a student's learning process will show this.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
but technologically driven instructor do not.
but technologically driven instructors do not.
Sentence: After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the depate over computerized teaching will forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and computers
Sentence: In summary, a robotic teacher lacks the discipline needed to instruct students properly and actually operates to retard a student's ablilty to learn new information.
Error: ablilty Suggestion: ability
Sentence: After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the depate over computerized teaching will forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers.
Error: depate Suggestion: ?
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 277 350
No. of Characters: 1459 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.08 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.267 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.919 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.294 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.531 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.057 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5