1. In the past, the role of teacher was to provide information. Today, student have access to wide ources of information. There is, therefore, no rule of teacher in modern education. Do you agree or dagree?
The society has been developing in recent years, it following the education system has been changing inasmuch as. Guys of the future and staff prepare in the schools and kindergartens and their hardworking region ministry and agency. When my parents had been studying in school forty years ago, they had to learn also teached subjects of teachers. This method still now in some countries. But it changed one thing is this is narrowing teachers' involvement and it encourages tending to cooperation with parents and children. This is, on one hand, it can advent personnel independent so develop and discovery themselves. On the other hand, control to famish children with ambition deficient, further children do not an improvement for the subject and it probably moves to carelessness. On the other hand, when ambitions deficient children control to lack, and children do not an improvement for a subject and it probably moves to carelessness.
The kid starts to socialize since chasmed in the womb. Therefore, little students had been started to socialize process and they receive teachers also the same as with their mom I think that. Although I probably am conservative and children's learning activity does not guarantee for themselves, teachers have got to lead, developing and directing. Therefore the teacher should improve their teaching skill and education mayor must improve the university’s system preparing teacher.
Today entering first-class little baby, tomorrow maybe possibly the president. Thus it must cooperation with parents, students, and teachers in order to them prepare.
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinio 56
- Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience. 56
- Some people believe theoretical subjects e g mathematics philosophy and economy should not be taught in universities because they should focus on practical subjects e g marketing computer programming and accounting To what extent do you agree or disagree 52
- This chart below shows figures for attendance at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017. 56
- Some people believe that entertainers are more important than scientists. Do you agree or disagree? Support with reasons and examples from your own experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 854, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions deficient children control to lack, and children do not an improvement for a...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivity does not guarantee for themselves, teachers have got to lead, developing an...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... got to lead, developing and directing. Therefore the teacher should improve their teachi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... tomorrow maybe possibly the president. Thus it must cooperation with parents, stude...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, still, therefore, thus, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44578313253 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93313494273 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0113054984 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106336087409 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351949250138 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348676234867 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810058419945 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414294384269 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.