(2.4.2022): In the future, it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than younger people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative development?
These days, the number of older people has exceeded youthful people. Although there can be no doubt that life expectancy people can be beneficial to society to a certain extent, I assert that this development will do more harm than benefit.
On the one hand, several reasons explain the positive edges of a dramatic increase in the proportion of people aged 60 or more. The first reason relates to the rich wisdom and knowledge that they have learned throughout their lives. Therefore, they can make a positive contribution to the community, and solve conflict or challenge that boosts the economic prospect. Also, valuable comprehension is transferred hands-on experience to the young generations to promote. In addition, older people spend most of their time staying at home so they can help parents take care of kids. For example, my grandparent brought me up and taught me valuable life lessons that brought me chances to improve myself when my parents were at work.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why I still believe aging populations bring nations more harm. The main one is the increase in the economic pressure to sustain older people. For instance, the government will need to divert more funding into elderly care, which will shoulder a greater tax burden and place a heavy obligation on healthcare systems. Furthermore, a decline in the working-aging population plays a vital role in hancing push-up wages causing wage inflation. As a result, young people who deal with unemployment will not be able to support the entire elderly population financially.
In conclusion, the expanding number of older people in comparison to younger people is a negative development for the healthcare and productivity of the labor force.
- 2 4 2022 In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than younger people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 69
- Cam 12 test 3 The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 abd 2013 63
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 70
- The diagrams below give information about two road tunnels in two Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14035087719 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80972238102 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3065814297 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268831739419 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822093435752 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893448089887 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18709556602 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919505173612 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.