In the contemporary life, it is hard to evaluate someone by their characteristics only without factors like social status and material possessions. There are arguments that whether values like honour, kindness and trust are obsolete nowadays to be replaced by social power and finance. This essay will show my point of view and suggestions about this issue.
In terms of a person's worth has been judged based on their position and wallet, it is appropriate because these can partly reflect the process and determination for achieving goals of individuals. Societies tend to need talented people serving for them so that as much as profit will be created, which means the higher place we sit, the more valuable we are. Moreover, along with the progress we made in work can lead to the rise of salary. So it is understadable that we will possess more money and become richer, thanks to suffering from difficulties in life and our pure effort to be a better version every day.
On the other hand, it could be a mistake if we neglected behavior matter. Enterprises do pay a particular attention to how their workers act for making proper evaluation lately. For instance, an employee who is compassionate, grateful and humble deserves to receive reliability from his or her boss than the one who is selfish and ready to talk back at any time though they have higher social status and possessions. Besides, a good personality makes us different from animals, from hearing others' stories to sympathizing with them are kind of exquisite things forming our worth needed to be preserved rather than abandoned.
In conclusion, I assume that social status and material possessions must definitely be included in the list of judgement. But it is completely wrong to say honour, kindness and trust are no longer critical and old-fashioned as these are core values of humans that have to be maintained in any period of time.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them the sense of cooperation not competition 75
- 5 The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...umans that have to be maintained in any period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94099378882 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81690714398 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636645962733 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8672634496 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249131637017 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798315302791 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575337958331 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152905167638 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066352139209 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.